Tuesday, January 17, 2012

ISU MAHASISWA

1.kita melihat bagaimana PR pertikaikan tindakan polis dalam menstabilkan keadaan di UPSI ..dan tindakan polis tersebut dibuat adalah propaganda jahat oleh PR...dan polis diberi dengan bermacam-macam gelaran dan difitnah

2.pengurusan UPSI dikecam dengan pelbagai serangan....semua pihak yang tidak sehaluan dengan tindakan pro mahasiswa yang didalangi PR dipersalahkan !!!

3.sedangkan polis dan pengurusan UPSI berhak ke atas keselamatan kawasan mereka..Kampus mereka....dan polis berhak ke atas keselamatan rakyat...termasuk warga kampus....dan kerajaan berhak mengawal dan stabilkan keadaan...

4.pengurusan UPSI dan kerajaan dan polis...tidak boleh benarkan PR ataupun sesiapa sahaja membuat apa saja sesuka hati mereka....kerajaan bertanggng jawab ke atas keselamatan negara dan rakyat...dan begitu juga dengan pengurusan UPSI yang bertanggungjawab ke atas kampus mereka..... kitatidak tahu...apa akan jadi jika tiada kawalan..dan tiada pihak yang berani ke depan utk menjamin keselamatan....situasi di UPSI...

5.PR dan kumpulan mahasiswa bercakap bab hak mereka sahaj !! mereka tidak pulak berkata tentang tanggungjwb mereka sebagai rakyat dan kepada negara !!! segala yang mereka buat betul !! sangat pelik !!

6.mereka menggunakan nama hak asasi manyusia dan hak sebagai rakyat dalam pertahankan perbuatan jahat mereka..provokasi politik mereka.....mereka selewengkan maksud hak !!

7.bagaimana jika..rakyat pulak di kawasan UPSI....dan semua warga UPSI yang lain....memprotes perbuatan mahasiswa pro pembangkang ni pada hari tesebut ? bagaimana jika...warga kampus pro kerajaan....menentang...serangan provokasi kumpulan mahasiswa yg didalangi PR ini pada hri tersebut ?

KES LIWAT - KENAPA ANUAR TERLEPAS

yg mcm nih ambo jem dop reti nk balas huhu....
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Jack Stone Ramai yg keliru dgn kata2 Karpal Singh dimana dia mengemukakan soalan kepada pendakwaraya yg menggunakan Seksyen 377B Penal Code yg hanya mnghukum DSAI sbg pesalah tetapi Seksyen tersebut adalah utk perbuatan "commiting carnal intercourse againts the order of nature" bg kedua2 pihak Dengan CONSENT...utk Liwat secara PAKSA atau Without the Consent spt yg didakwa oleh Saifool, pendakwaraya seharusnya menggunakan Seksyen 377C...jikalau menggunakan seksyen 377B, ini bermakna ada Kerelaan dari Saifool...ini yg Karpal singh cuba perketengahkan...kenapa DSAI didakwa sedangkan Saiful tidak didakwa juga dibawah seksyen 377B for consented sex.

Karpal bukan mengatakan YA BENAR IA BERLAKU...tetapi Karpal membangkitkan Hujah dan bertanya Kalau berdasarkan Seksyen 377B maka ia adalah Pelakuan SUKA SAMA SUKA...so Kedua2nya Patut didakwa..bukan satu pihak saja.

Tapi ada MANGKUK tidak faham hujah2 ini...sebab tu kita lihat bukan main lagi dok sebut isu suka sama suka..padahal diorang x faham pun kenapa Karpal Singh Raised issue ni.

Kesimpulannya...Macai tetap macai...IQ rendah.

credit: AJ~
· · · January 11 at 2:51am

    • Tun Maharezza sbb saiful adalah pengadu kes...
      January 11 at 12:30pm ·
    • Tun Maharezza isu with consent sekali pun....iwat tetap berlaku...yg salah disisi undang 2 ialah liwat..suka sama suka atau pun x suka..ataupun apa aja..sama aja..
      January 11 at 12:31pm ·
    • Tun Maharezza saiful lebh kpd...'' memebnarkan tanpa kerelaan mutlak '' dn bukannya suka sama suka.....elemen '' membenarkan tanpa kerelaan ' tidak membawa arti maksud...'' dirogol liwat ataupun dipaksa "..

      maksudnya..377b..ialah sama sama suka dn rela...tetapi dlm kes saiful...ia tidak mutlak suka sama suka..saiful lebih kpd '' benarkan tanpa kerelaan ''

      sbb itu....saiful x didakwa dlm hal kes ini..
      January 11 at 12:34pm ·
    • Tun Maharezza bg 377c....ia liwat rogol.maknanya.anwar liwat saiful..dgn cara paksa dn rogol..dn tiada undur '' membenarkan dtanpa kerelaan ''
      January 11 at 12:35pm ·
    • Tun Maharezza itulah bezanya....
      January 11 at 12:35pm ·
    • Wan Ezhan Ok tqvm boss :)
      January 11 at 12:36pm via mobile ·
    • Tun Maharezza dn dlm kes anwar saiful..bab seksyenbukanlah isu kes kalah...tetapi..kes kalah atas sbb..

      1.sample dna dismpan polis..sdgkan ia sepatutnya disimpan dlm makmal kimia.

      2.sample dna dlm simpanan polis..amat boileh dimanipulasikan...kerana tiada jaminan..benda itu x diusik....dn lagipun....polis yg simpanan bahan dna itu..simpan dlm almari dia..dn bukan di stor logistik pdrm yg ada fasiliti.simpanan bahan spt ini....dn stor pdrm juga x ada kelayakan utk menyimpan bahan dna spt ini...hanya makmal kimia saja ada kuasa dn fasiliti spt ini...

      3.atas sbb itulah...bahan bukti dna ini ditlak mahkamah....dn akibatnya....kes x dpt dibuktikan......
      January 11 at 12:37pm ·
    • Wan Ezhan Ok boss tyvm brtambah faham nih :)
      January 11 at 12:52pm via mobile · · 1

ISU HASSAN ALI DAN ANUAR IBRAHIM

1.pembebasan anwar ibrahim telah dimanupulasikan dan dieksploitasikan politik kononnya membuktikan dirinya difitnah !! beliau mendakwa dia diftnah utk mentup fakta kes yg tidak menolak aktiviti liwat berlaku.

2.PAS membuktikan kesetiaan politik kepada Anwar Ibrahim DAP dan PKR dengan memecat Hassan Ali yang ternyata sebenarnya di landasan yang lebih tepat. Soal prinsip bukan intipati isu ini, intipati isu PAS dan Hassan Ali ini ialah ,...keakuran atau kepatuhan PAS kepada kehendak kuasa sebenar PR iaitu DAP PKR dan Anuar.

3.PAS cuba menutup kelemahan dan tekanan politk yg mereka sedang alami dengan menyabitkan UMNO dalam isu Hassan Ali dan berkokok dengan isu pembebasan Anwar. Kita semua tahu yang PAS sedang cuba berusaha dengan bersungguh sungguh dalam keadaan tenat untuk menutup malu maruah PAS.

4.Percaturan politik PAS dan Anwar Ibrahim serupa sahaja dalam situasi politik seperti ini , iaitu dengan menggunakan strategi kalih serang isu , Anwar tekan PAS , dan PAS pula tutup malu mereka dengan bermain isu pembebasan Anwar.

harus diingat....sejarah x pernah menipu !!! Mat Sabu dari PAS adalah orang yang berikan gelaran Al-Juburin kepada Anwar Ibrahim !!

KES SAIFUL - Tun Maharezza

Tun Maharezza anwar elak bagi sample..

Yesterday at 13:37 · Like · 1

Tun Maharezza cuba berikan sample..klu berani..

Yesterday at 13:38 · Like · 1

Tun Maharezza hahahahaha

Yesterday at 13:38 · Like · 1

Lestari Chinta wakakkakakakkaakakkkakakkkkkkk

kk

Yesterday at 13:38 · Like

Tun Maharezza ckp bvanyak wat apa..kes 36 kali tangguh..sample x beri..bukti x disanggah..dok menyalak kon spirasi aja...

Yesterday at 13:38 · Unlike · 2

Sheikh Sakai Najibor Alhancing Adakah umno akan bela saifool walaupn saifool ternyata salah kerana memfitnah??kita tukar plak..

Yesterday at 13:38 via Mobile · Like

Emma Harith asyik2 konspirasi..kena suntik arsenik la...kena suntik hiv la...

Yesterday at 13:39 · Like · 1

Tun Maharezza mana bukti saiful fitnah ? bgtau jap ssna..

Yesterday at 13:39 · Like

Emma Harith bila hidup tak nak pula kata konspirasi kerajaan sbb bagi dia hidup...;-)

Yesterday at 13:39 · Like

Albert Wesker Al-Satashiros pergh tak de orang kene suntik arsenik boleh hidup lebih 6 bulan, kebal tul al-jubs ni

Yesterday at 13:39 · Like

Tun Maharezza klu saiful nipu dlm mahkamah..saiful akan di caj emebri penyataan palsu...

Yesterday at 13:39 · Like · 1

Emma Harith SSNA...nak fitnah apa..karpal seorg peguam bela anwar , sndiri yg kata suka sama suka..;-)

Yesterday at 13:40 · Like · 1

Sheikh Sakai Najibor Alhancing Standrt lah tangguh sapa nk kena penjara lama2 tun..hahahahah

Yesterday at 13:40 via Mobile · Like · 1

Lestari Chinta standard org da kalah.......wakakakkaaka

Yesterday at 13:40 · Like

Reezal Akmal DAP parti Komunis

Yesterday at 13:40 · Like · 2

Margaret Justice DAP IS FIGHTING THE CHINESE WARFARE APPROACH AND WHERE CAN ANWAR AND HADI COMPARE WITH THEIR SILAT APPROACH ...

Yesterday at 13:41 · Like

Ct Zye Mohd Zawawi spin la pah ke ceroh...yg pasti road to putrajaya hampir menjadi kenyataan kekekekeke

Yesterday at 13:41 · Like

Sheikh Sakai Najibor Alhancing SSNA...nak fitnah apa..karpal seorg peguam bela anwar , sndiri yg kata suka sama suka..;------->emma undang2 manusia apa pun bleh manipulasi utk bebas kan...

Yesterday at 13:41 via Mobile · Like · 1

Tun Maharezza kes anwar bebas :

1.anwar beas..cai pr kata..saiful fitnah dn pelbagai mcm propa...

2.rahim tambi chik bebas kes rogol....mcm mcm jugak cai pr kata itu ini...

3.double standard ah ?

hahahahahahaa !!!

Yesterday at 13:42 · Like · 1

Margaret Justice ROAD TO PUTRAJAYA IS JAM DUE TO PR RALLY SO ROAD TO SUNGEI BULOH IS MORE REACHABLE INSTEAD...JUST WATCH ...

Yesterday at 13:43 · Like

Margaret Justice ANWAR IS NOT BEBAS ...JUST DELAYED SO THAT HIS VVVIP ROOM CAN BE REPAINTED WITH IMAGES OF SHAMSIDAR ...

Yesterday at 13:45 · Like

Margaret Justice NO NEED DNA NOW SINCE SUKA SAMA SUKA IS ADMITTED....ADMISSION RANGE PRIORITY IN LAW...

Yesterday at 13:45 · Like

Tun Maharezza dap diam aja ..x pun kecoh anwar bebas...sbb apa ah ? dap marah ka anwar bebas ? anwar bebas..pr x leh guna isu anwar lagi !! dap bengang dgn situasi ini...dap x dpt gunakan anwar lagi...

hahahahahaahaha !!!

Yesterday at 13:47 · Like

Tun Maharezza pembebasan anwar :

1.jika seseorg itu dibebaskan mahkamah..beliau boleh mengambil tindkaan saman balas sivil keatas sang pengadu dn pihak kerajaan yg telah memalukan dia dlm kes ini.

2.aku tunggu..anwar punya saman balas keata saiful dn jbtn peguam negara...

3.kita tgk...berani x anwar saman balas....

4.tapi anwar dh maafkan saiful dn semua..kita tahu..itulah signal alsan anwar x mau saman balas saiful..kerana bimbang..jika dia saman balas...perbicaraan akan mula sekali lagi...dn semua bukti akan keluar lagi..sbb tu anwar x mau saman balas...

5.tapi dm kes saman lain..anwar bukan main saman balas....kes saiful ni..anwar x mau plak eh ?

hahahahahaa...

Yesterday at 13:56 · Like

Margaret Justice USUALLY THE COURT AWARDED COST BUT IN THIS CASE HOW MUCH WAS THE COST AWARDED TO ANWAR...IT CAN AMOUNT TO MILLIONS EASILY FOR THIS CASE...ANYWAY THE AG MUST APPEAL AS IT IS BEYOND DOUBT THAT THE SODOMY ACT DID COMMIT WITH KARPAL'S ADMISSION....WHETHER CONSENT OR NOT IS A DIFFERENT ISSUE AS THE LAW IS CLEAR THAT ANYONE COMMITTED SODOMY ARE PUNISHABLE UNDER THE LAW....PERIOD

Yesterday at 14:00 · Like

Margaret Justice IF SAIFUL TAKES UP A CIVIL SUIT THEN KARPAL WILL APPLY THE LAW OF RES JUDICATA ON THE ISSUE ...

Yesterday at 14:01 · Like

Tun Maharezza saiful can appeal to higher court..the appelet court for his case dimissal....

Yesterday at 14:05 · Like

Tun Maharezza saiful can do civil suit against anwar....

Yesterday at 14:05 · Like

Margaret Justice SAIFUL WILL WIN EVENTUALLY AS IT IS ADMITTED THAT SODOMY DID EXIST BY ANWAR HIMSELF ....

Yesterday at 14:06 · Like

Tun Maharezza saiful can file sivil suit aginst the police who cause the case to weak...we all knew that...the judgement ground for the case dismissal is due to :

1.the dna sample were kept by the police in the inspector cupboard..

2.whereby..it is against the law...the lab should keep the material....not the police...

3.the case was own by..the issue of the dna sample..storage issue....because...the place where police kept the dna sample.is beyond reasonable doubt..

Yesterday at 14:07 · Like

Margaret Justice FILING THE CASE AGAINST THE POLICE FOR NEGLIGENCE IS NOT GOING TO PUT ANWAR IN JAIL FOR SODOMING SAIFUL ....THE AG SHOULD APPEAL AND GO ON THE GROUND OF ADMISSION AND REFER TO THE LAW OF SODOMY ....

Yesterday at 14:09 · Like

Tun Maharezza i talking abt saioful right n what he can do...

Yesterday at 14:10 · Like

Tun Maharezza saiful citizen right...

Yesterday at 14:10 · Like

Tun Maharezza the police r to bE blame in this case..negligENcE...

Yesterday at 14:11 · Like

Tun Maharezza the judge cant say whatver he likes...the judge can only say base on his judgement ground which derive from the process of evidence...the judge cant say even his personal views..the judge must only said matters related to rthe cse n fact that admitted by the court...

Yesterday at 14:13 · Like

Margaret Justice THE POLICE MIGHT BE NEGLIGENT IN HANDLING THE DNA BUT THAT IS NOT IMPORTANT AFTER THE ADMISSION OF ANEWAR THROUGH HIS LAWYER ...SUKA SAMA SUKA....THE JUSTICE IS WHETHER SAIFUK WAS SODOMIZE OR NOT ...THAT IS THE ISSUE AND THE DNA IS TO PROVE THAT..WITH ADMISSION THAT NO LONGER REQUIRED ...SEE IT FROM THIS ANGLE....THE JUDGE IS NOT TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN COMING TO THE DECISION ....

Yesterday at 14:15 · Like

Tun Maharezza the judge cannot admit the dna samle evidence..as the palce where the subject was stored is beyond reasonable doubt...

Yesterday at 14:16 · Like

Shamsuddin Hassan Anwar seharusnya lebih bertanggungjawab dan membuktikan stiap dakwaannya.Bukti kpd rakyat negara ini siapakah sebenarnya yg memberi tekanan kpd kerajaan dlm kes liwa liwat beliau.Kena tunjuk negara mana yg beri tekanan.Jgn main cakap saja,cakap mesti ada bukti.Anwar sepatutnya menarik balek tuduhan terdahulu yg mengatakan wujud konspirasi di dlm perbicaraan kes liwatnya.Anwar juga perlu buktikan penderiannya yg tetap da kredibiliti dlm sesuatu perkara.Tindak tanduk Anwar yg sentiasa membuat tuduhan dan menyebar temberang harus dinilai oleh rakyat khususnya penyokong PKR sendiri....

Yesterday at 14:16 via Mobile · Like

Tun Maharezza i didnt not deny the fact that indeed the sodomy act does occurred....the court did not deny the fact that...the sodomy act was infact happened..

Yesterday at 14:17 · Like

Tun Maharezza the court clearly state out the reason of the case dismissal..that is...the dna sample storage location....n the subject ..who kep the sample have no legal authority to do so...that is y...the dna sample cant be admitted as evidence....n the case is gone..due to the fact...

Yesterday at 14:18 · Like

Margaret Justice LET ME EXPRESS MY PERSONAL OPINION ON THIS DECISION...THE LEARNED JUDGE DO NOT WANT TO BE BLAMED SO HE JUST GET OUT OF THIS CASE WITH THIS FEW MINUTES DECISION ....IF HE WILL TO FIND ANWAR GUILTY HIS DECISION WILL BE AT LEAST 1000 PAGES ON ALL TOPIC ARGUED ...SO SHORT CUT JUST PUSH THE BLAME TO THE DNA....AND LET THE APPEAL COURT DO THE DONKEY WORK WRITING UP THE 1000 PAGES DECISION ....TO FIND HIM GUILTY....THERE IS NO DOUBT ABOUT IT SINCE ANWAR HIMSELF FINALLY ADMITTED BY SAYING SUKA SAMA SUKA...

Margaret Justice SAIFUL BEING VICTIM IS NOT GIVEN JUSTICE AS I SEE IT....

Yesterday at 14:21 · Like

Tun Maharezza i agree with u the judge decision were done in bad faith ...for the reason only the learned judge knew.....

there were cases where judges in silent..dismiss themselves thru such modus....

u n i knew y is that so..:)

Yesterday at 14:23 · Like

Margaret Justice THE ROOM IN SUNGEI BULOH NEEDS MORE RENOVATION AND IT WILL BE OCCUPIED BY ANWAR LATER ON...THE CASE IS NOT OVER ...AND EVENTUALLY HE WILL LAND THERE ...

Yesterday at 14:23 · Like

Tun Maharezza the justice for saiful were taken away by the police inspector who kept the sample.as he well knew..he dont have any authority dn he is not eligble to keep the sample...but he kept it to himself....n his superior.overlook the matters....

Yesterday at 14:24 · Like

Margaret Justice THIS JUDGE ALREADY BEING ACCUSE OF BIAS SO HE WANTS THE EASY WAY OUT...ANYWAY THE MATTER IS NOT OVER AND LET THE HIGHER COURT WITH MORE JUDGES DO THE WORK....

Yesterday at 14:25 · Like

Tun Maharezza the police inspector knew that...n he superior does knew too that.....they r the authroty to keep that dna sample...

Yesterday at 14:25 · Like

Tun Maharezza the judge were right !! i agreed with the judge decision...the sample having huge possibility to be manipulated....beyond reasonable doubts..

Yesterday at 14:26 · Like

Margaret Justice THE FACT REMAINS THAT SAIFUL WAS INDEED SODOMIZE ...SO ALL THIS IRRELEVANT....

Yesterday at 14:26 · Like

Tun Maharezza therefore...the judge decision...not to admit the dna sample...n make it as his judgement ground...is non argueable....

Yesterday at 14:27 · Like

Tun Maharezza however , thi situation does not justifiy anwar ibrahim innocent on the sodomy act...

Yesterday at 14:28 · Like

Margaret Justice POSSIBLITY BUT NOT CERTAIN...THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT SHOULD BE ON THE TRUTH OF HAPPENING....WITH THE ADMISSION THAN IT SETTLE THE DOIUBT OF SAIFUL BEING SODOMIZE....WHAT IS BETTER EVIDENCE THAN ADMISSION MADE IN COURT....

Yesterday at 14:28 · Like

Tun Maharezza the judge knew that , n the prosecution need to establish ...another dna sample that kept in proper hands...

Yesterday at 14:28 · Like

Margaret Justice APPEAL BY THE AG IS THE CORRECT APPROACH ....

Yesterday at 14:29 · Like · 1

Tun Maharezza the fight will be....

1.court decision to order awnar ibrahim to provide fresh semen sample for dna purpose.

2.all the procedures shall be under the eye of 3 rd partyy from both side...

3.the charges ection ..377b or 377 c

Yesterday at 14:30 · Like

Tun Maharezza section

Yesterday at 14:30 · Like

Tun Maharezza saaj....the police who kept the sample should be question..the lab guy..knew nuthing..as the sample were not registered oin their storage log....

Yesterday at 14:31 · Like

Tun Maharezza the lab guy..was given the sample.....y would they be question ?

Yesterday at 14:32 · Like

Tun Maharezza yeah mj..this case is easily appeal.....trust me...its not even any challenge to appeal for this case...its pcs of cake...hahahaaha...

Yesterday at 14:32 · Like

Margaret Justice APPEAL IS THE ONLY REMEDY AS I SEE IT....

Yesterday at 14:33 · Like · 1

Margaret Justice THE ADMISSION OF SUKA SAMA SUKA IS HELPFUL OVER RIDING ALL THE DNA FINDINGS...

Yesterday at 14:34 · Like

Tun Maharezza the benfit of doubts...in this case..severe punshiment..cant be taken granted.....its the human right n citizen right of anwar ibrahim the judge must gave the highest consideration....if the admit the sample....the court will be deemed in bad faith its credential n the legal fraternity...

Yesterday at 14:35 · Like

Margaret Justice TO ERR IS HUMAN...HUMAN MISTAKE IS BOUND TO HAPPEN ESPECIALLY NOT REALISING THAT THE SERIOUS OF THIS FINDING....

Yesterday at 14:35 · Like · 1

Tun Maharezza mj..the admission..r not direct quoted in court ! n it wasnt taken by the prosecution team...the prosecution team di not even request.the court to admit..the lawyers proposal of suka sama suka facts.....n the judge have the fullest n absolute right as a judge to consider it as matter legal bargaining..or...non interested by the prosecution team...i balme the prosecution team for taking lightly on the suka sama suka issue....they should request to the court to admitb the admission as the main element for judgement ground..

Yesterday at 14:38 · Unlike · 1

Tun Maharezza saiful can request the appellet court to consider :

1.his evidence were handle in bad faith by the police n therefore he deserved the fullest right to correct the stuation by requesting a totally new investigating team....n certainly.....3rd party as observers from both side...

2.request the appellet court to order anwar ibrahim to provide fresh semen sample for dna test...as it vital to prove the link of sexual activities between him n anwar

Yesterday at 14:42 · Unlike · 1

Tun Maharezza human or not...the police themselves treated this case as high profile case...n it is not acceptable when the inspector neglect the importance of the case..n the rule n procedures that required by the law in keeping the sample...as it is an important evidence...the essesnce of the case..the sample were not given high profile case treatment!.

Yesterday at 14:44 · Like

Tun Maharezza how can it be ? such a high profile case dosnt have 1 duty officer to handle all the procedures checklist all the time ?

Yesterday at 14:45 · Like

Tun Maharezza we all knew..this case is vital n important n its a public interest...

Yesterday at 14:45 · Like

Tun Maharezza i cannot accpet the police inspectior mistakes...he must taken liable for the case...

Yesterday at 14:46 · Unlike · 2

Tun Maharezza sum ppl r not meticoulous.

Yesterday at 14:48 · Like

Tun Maharezza if the dna sample...can be done correctly...certainly..saiful won the trophy...n in my professional opinion....it is pcs of cake...saiful citizen right must be taken lightly...n so do anwar's....therefore...the appelet will decide in saiful favour......my opinion is base on the legal rights of both side...

Yesterday at 14:53 · Like · 1

Tun Maharezza the assurance no more form police..but suhakam shall be the best entity to guarantte the sample evidence shall not be tampered with...

Yesterday at 14:53 · Like

Margaret Justice this case must not be laid to rest so the AG must do something about it to rectify the wrong...INJUSTICE to Saiful if this is quiet down....

Yesterday at 14:56 · Like

Margaret Justice sama suka sama is what the court should be directed in coming to a decision now...in the appeal court...

Yesterday at 14:57 · Like

Tun Maharezza mj..agreed....even if the prosecution refuse to appeal agaisnt this case..saiful still do it thru civil suit...no worries...saiful have all his citizen right to do so......n so do anwar...n in this case....favor is at saifuls.....he has the upperhand...

Yesterday at 14:57 · Like

Margaret Justice civil case is for damages and will not get him to jail ....only the criminal court can do justice for Saiful....

Yesterday at 15:00 · Like

Tun Maharezza the civil court can order yhe case to be re admit to criminal court....

Yesterday at 15:01 · Like

Mohd Joharuddin hahahahaha.... Fauzi Abd Rahim jangan mara2... wakakakakakakak..... hang sembang satu fakta pon tara...

Yesterday at 15:02 · Like

Tun Maharezza when the civil court found element of crime in their court case..they r obligue to report to the authority concern....thats their responsivle...

Yesterday at 15:02 · Like

Margaret Justice Saiful is a citizen and nothing political at all...I am supporting his rights for justice....NO UMNO OR BN etc..

Yesterday at 15:02 · Like

Margaret Justice the next case to proceed is on the China Doll case ....

Yesterday at 15:04 · Like

Tun Maharezza the anwar legal team..dont even bother to request the court to get saiful with perjury charge...y ? y didnt the anwar lawyers apply from the court ?

i think..because they cant establish perjury element in saiful statement to court....simple as that....

Yesterday at 15:04 · Like

Tun Maharezza u n me knew karpal sing style...tehnical issue...but in thi saiful situation..karpal singh did nuthing...

Yesterday at 15:04 · Like

Margaret Justice keep Anwar busy with more court cases ...China Doll case where he again alleged conspiracy etc...

Yesterday at 15:06 · Like

Tun Maharezza to me...dont borther anwar at all !! he is irrelevant !!

Yesterday at 15:09 · Like

Tun Maharezza let saiful appeal the case...

Yesterday at 15:09 · Like

Mohd Joharuddin hehehe.... Fauzi Abd Rahim tak puas ati erk... hahahaha... aku jenuh cari ko nyer post yang ada fakta, hahaha.. satu pon tada... cer ko bagi satu fakta..

Yesterday at 15:09 · Like

Tun Maharezza justice must be done...

Yesterday at 15:09 · Like

Tun Maharezza kes anwar bebas :

1.anwar bebas..cai pr kata..saiful fitnah dn pelbagai mcm propa...

2.rahim tambi chik bebas kes rogol....mcm mcm jugak cai pr kata itu ini...

3.double standard ah ?

hahahahahahaa !!!

Yesterday at 15:10 · Like

Tun Maharezza sila beritau saya konspirasi itu japs....point by point...

Yesterday at 15:11 · Like

KEADILAN UNTUK SAIFUL

1. Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, bekas pembantu pembantu Anwar Ibrahim perlu mendapat pembelaan yang sewajarnya kerana ia adalah haknya sebagai seorang warganegara Malaysia untuk membersihkan nama dn maruahnya.

2.Majlis Peguam dilihat lebih mementingkan pembangkang dan menafikan hak Saiful apabila meminta Pejabat Peguam Negara tidak merayu terhadap keputusan mahkamah itu, yang melepas dan membebaskan Anwar daripada pertuduhan meliwatnya pada 2008.

3. Bapa Saiful iaitu Azlan Mohd Lazim mempunyai hak untuk memohon Pejabat Peguam Negara mengemukakan rayuan terhadap pertuduhan itu bagi mendapatkan keadilan untuk anaknya.

4. Perundangan Malaysia tidak pernah memilih untuk memihak kepada sesiapa pun, dn dlm kes ini, pembelaan terhadap Saiful adalah tidak bertentangan dengan undang-undang negara.

5. Apa yang di lihat kini, Majlis Peguam Negara telah berlaku berat sebelah kerana selama ini tidak pernah membantah tertuduh (Anwar Ibrahim) dalam kes tersebut sedangkan mengikut rekod pihak tetrtuduh telah mengemukakan 36 kali penangguhan perbicaraan.

6. Oleh itu, adalah tidak adil apabila Majlis Peguam negara di sokong oleh para pemimpin kanan PR mula mengeluarkan hujahan utk menghalang proses rayuan drp saiful, yang baru hendak bermula.

7. Mengapa pilih kasih ini berlaku? Adakah hanya kerana Saiful ini hanyalah seorang insan biasa yang terpaksa berhadapan dgn seorang ahli politik?

8. Majlis Peguam terutamanya haruslah bersikap neutral dan tidak menghalang sebarang proses keadilan dilaksanakan.

9.Untuk merayu kes di mahkamah rayuan, saiful boleh meminta satu pasukan penyisatan baru, krn pasukan penyiasatan sebelumnya telah mengenepikan prosedur penyimpanan bahan bukti, sehinggakan sampel tersebut tidak boleh diterima sbgai bahan pembuktian utama.

10 . Pihak ketiga drp kedua-dua belah pihak dn pihak yang tiada berkepentingan juga di perlukan bagi memastikan pada kali ini prosedur bagi penyimpanan bahan bukti kes berprofail tinggi dipatuhi.

11. SUHAKAM juga perlulah ke hadapan utk sama-sama memastikan bahawa Saiful mendapat haknya sbgai warganegara, dn juga sebagai pihak ketiga yang tiada berkepentingan bg memastikan prosedur proses penyimpanan bahan bukti berprofail tinggi di patuhi, dn tidak ada penyelewengan dilakukan oleh kedua-dua pihak.

12. Jika DNA sampel disimpan mengikut prosedur yang sepatutnya Saiful kemungkinan besar akan memenangi kes tersebut.

13. Pihak Mahkamah Rayuan juga wajar memerintahkan anwar memberi sampel air mani baru sbgai pembuktian dna, krn ia adalah untuk tujuan menunjukkan berlakunya aktiviti seksual antara mereka